Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo are expected to sign a US-brokered peace agreement today that could end nearly three decades of conflict and open Central Africa's mineral riches to American investors.
So what? The long-running, complex and seemingly intractable conflict in eastern Congo is one of the great tragedies of this century, even more so for the extent to which it has been overlooked. Ending it would finally bring stability to a vast, crisis-torn region where
- six million people have been killed since 1996;
- five million people are currently displaced; and
- women continue to face widespread sexual violence.
Proposal. The peace initiative draws inspiration from Donald Trump's minerals deal with Ukraine. In February, Congo's president, Félix Tshisekedi, offered American companies access to his country's natural wealth in return for help kicking out M23, a rebel group backed by Rwanda that captured a large swathe of eastern Congo earlier this year.
Trump has mostly shown indifference towards Africa, cutting aid and subjecting parts of the continent to travel bans. But the idea, which aligns with his foreign policy priority of striking profitable deals, piqued his interest.
Then. The roots of the conflict are in the 1994 Rwanda genocide, when Hutu extremists killed roughly 800,000 people, mostly Tutsis, in 100 days. The perpetrators fled into eastern Congo, pursued by Rwanda's armed forces.
Now. Rwanda insists its continued military presence aims to thwart groups connected to the genocide and flatly denies supporting M23, despite ample evidence to the contrary unearthed by UN investigators. Congo accuses Rwanda of sowing chaos in its eastern regions to pillage its minerals.
The bonanza. Congo's riches are vast, as it
- produces roughly 80 per cent of the world's cobalt, the precious metal present in nearly all rechargeable batteries;
- is the leading producer of tantalum, essential in smartphones; and
- has huge deposits of copper, tin, zinc, lead and gold.
These minerals have helped fuel the crisis. Last year, the UN said M23 generates $300,000 a month in taxes by controlling a single area home to large amounts of tantalum. Congo's foreign minister, Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, said that the country needed to transform the minerals "into a source of hope".
View from DC. Nearly all of Congo's cobalt is mined and processed by China. Trump officials want to control part of this crucial supply chain.
They also believe the presence of American companies will convince warring parties that stability is more profitable than war. "Trade will lead to peace," a senior state department official told The Observer last month.
Cautionary tales. Two separate peace processes led by Angola and Kenya failed last year. The Angolan initiative was meant to culminate in a peace deal signing in December, but the Rwandan president Paul Kagame pulled out at the last minute because Congo refused to commit to dialogue with M23.
Unanswered. The full details of the US-brokered agreement have not been made public, but will face similar hurdles. M23, one of 120 militias that have thrived in the regional chaos, is not part of the talks. Still to be addressed is
- how Rwanda's compliance will be monitored;
- whether Rwanda has admitted backing M23; and
- if M23 has agreed to withdraw and disband.
Trump's Africa adviser, Massad Boulos, has previously said Rwanda and Congo will sign bilateral minerals deals with the US on the same day as the peace agreement. It is not clear whether this will happen at today's signing, which is between foreign ministers, or at a later heads of state summit.
Hard sell. KoBold, a California start-up backed by Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, has already agreed to invest $1 billion in a huge lithium mine in Congo. US firms may not follow suit. Several American companies have pulled out of the country in recent years, frustrated by corruption and the lack of legal protections.
What's more… striking a quick deal in Central Africa is the sort of PR-friendly win that appeals to Trump in his efforts to be seen as a peacemaker. But ensuring it ends one of the world's most deadly and enduring crises will take decades of engagement.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario